बीएलओ ड्यूटी पर रोक लगाए जाने सम्बन्धी मा0 उच्च न्यायालय का नवीनतम आदेश देखें (आदेश दिनाँक 05 नवम्बर 2019)
Court No. – 2
Case :- WRIT – A No. – 16850 of 2019
Petitioner :- Satish Kumar And 8 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Yatindra
Hon’ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Connect this case along with the records of Writ Petition No. 60068 of
2016 (Shaheen Praveen vs. State of U.P. and others).
Respondents are allowed four weeks’ time to file counter affidavit, two
weeks’ thereafter is allowed to the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit.
List thereafter before the Court having jurisdiction.
The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the
petitioners are working as Assistant Teacher in Junior/Senior Basic
Schools run by Basic Education Board in District Bulandshahr. The
provisions of Intermediate Act, 1921 is applicable. Petitioners are
aggrieved by the impugned order (annexure-1 to the writ petition) passed
by the third respondent, Sub Divisional Magistrate/Election Registration
Officer, Bulandshahr, requisitioning the duty of the petitioners as Booth
Level Officer for revision of the voter-list. Learned counsel for the
petitioner has placed reliance on the Division Bench decision rendered in
Sunita Sharma vs. State of U.P. and others : 2015 (3) ESC 1289 (All)
(DB) to contend that the requisition of the petitioners is illegal and in teeth
of the provisions of Section 27 of the Right of Children to Free and
Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
Submission requires consideration.
Till the next date of listing, effect and operation of the impugned order
(annexure-1 to the writ petition), shall remain stayed. It is directed that in
the meantime, the petitioner shall not be forced to perform the duty of
Booth Level Officer by the respondents without the leave of the Court.
Order Date :- 5.11.2019
Mukesh Kr.
